Wednesday, February 16, 2011

The End of History and the Last Man

Francis Fukuyama,  Avon Books, NY 1992

xvi
[The Desire for Recognition]
According to Hegel, human beings like animals have natural needs and desires for objects outside themselves such as food, drink, shelter, and above all the preservation of their own bodies.  Man differes fundamentally from the animals, however, because in addition he desires the desire of other men, that is, he wants to be “recognized.”  In particular, he wants to be recognized as a human being, that is, as a being with a certain worth or dignity.  This worth in the first instance is related to his willingness to risk his life in a struggle over pure prestige.  For only man is able to overcome his most basic animal instincts, chief amoung them his instinct for self-preservation, for the sake of higher, abstract principles and goals.  According to Hegel, the desire for recognition initially drives two primordial combatants to seek to make the other “recognize” their humanness by staking their lives in a mortal battle.  When the natural fear of death leads one combatant to submit, the relationship of master and slave is born.  The stakes in this bloody battle at the beginning of history are not food, shelter, or security, but pure prestige.  And precisely because the goal of that battle is not determined by biology, Hegel sees in it the first glimmer of human freedom.

The desire for recognition may at first appear to be an unfamiliar concept, but it is as old as the tradition of Western political philosophy, and consitiutes a thoroughly familiar part of the human personality.   It was first described by Plato in the Republic, when he noted that there were three parts to the soul, a desiring part, a reasoning part, and a part that he called thymos, or “spiritedness.”  Much of human behavior can be explained as a combination of the first two parts, desire and reason; desire induces men to seek things outside themselves, while reason or calculation shows them the best way to get them.  But in addition, human beings seek recognition of their own worth, or of the people, things, or principles that they invest with worth.  The propensity to invest the self with a certain value, and to demand recognition for that value, is what in today’s popular language we would call “self-esteem.”  The propensity to feel self-esteem arises out of the part of the soul called thymos.  It is like an innate human sense of justice.  People believe that the have a certain worth, and when other people treat them as though they are worth less than that, they experience the emotion of anger.  Conversely, when people fail to live up to their own sense of worth, they feel shame, and when they are evaluated correctly in proportion to their worth, the feel pride.  The desire for recognition, and the accompanying emotions of anger, shame, and pride; are parts of the human personality critical to political life.  According to Hegel, they are what drives the whole historical process.

By Hegel’s account, the desire to be recognized as a human being with dignity drove man to the beginning of history into bloody battle to the death for prestige.  The outcome of this battle was a division of human society into a class of masters, who were willing to risk their lives, and a class of slaves, who gave in to their natural fear of death.  But the relationship of lordship and bondage, which took a wide variety of forms in all of the unequal, aristocratic societies that have characterized the greater part of human history, failed ultimately to satisfy the desire for recognition of either the masters or the slaves.  The slave, of course, was not acknowledged as a human being in any way whatsoever.  But the recognition enjoyed by the master was deficient as well, because he was not recognized by other masters, but slaves whose humanity was as yet incomplete.  Dissatisfaction with the flawed recognition available in aristocratic societies constituted a “contradiction” that engendered further states of history.

Hegel believed that the “contradiction” inherent in the relationship of lordship and bondage was finally overcome as a result of the French and, one would have to add, American revolutions.  These democratic revolutions abolished the distinction between master and slave b y making the former slaves their own masters and by establishing the principles of popular sovereignty and the rule of law.  The inherently unequal recognition of masters and slaves is replaced by universal and reciprocal recognition, where every citizen recognizes the dignity and humanity of every other citizen, and where that dignity is recognized in turn by the state through the granting of rights.

No comments:

Post a Comment